Pharmacist Removed from the Register for Misconduct and Dishonesty

Date of Decision: November 14, 2024

Registrant's Role: Pharmacist

Outcome: Removal from the register, with interim suspension imposed.

GPhC Standards Breached: Standard 2: Work in partnership with others. Standard 5: Use professional judgement. Standard 6: Be honest and trustworthy. Standard 8: Speak up when things go wrong. Standard 9: Demonstrate leadership and set a good example.

Case Summary

This case involves a pharmacist who was removed from the register following multiple instances of professional misconduct and dishonesty while working as the responsible pharmacist at Jhoots Pharmacy. The Fitness to Practise Committee found several serious breaches of the General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) standards.

Background

The misconduct spanned multiple areas of professional responsibility, including:

  1. Failing to maintain accurate and up-to-date Controlled Drugs (CD) records over several months, risking patient safety and regulatory compliance.
  2. Dispensing incorrect doses of methadone and neglecting to annotate FP10MDA prescriptions, causing significant risks to vulnerable patients.
  3. Dishonestly dispensing a range of medications, including controlled drugs, to himself without valid prescriptions, spanning 23 occasions.

Key Findings

  • Dishonesty: The pharmacist knowingly used their personal Patient Medication Record (PMR) to mark items as private prescriptions without valid prescriptions, intending to dispense medications for personal use.
  • Patient Safety Risks: Inaccurate CD records and incorrect dispensing of methadone compromised patient safety and breached the trust placed in pharmacists to ensure proper custodianship of medications.
  • Professional Failures: The failure to raise concerns about workplace challenges or admit errors compounded the seriousness of the misconduct.

Outcome and Rationale

The Committee concluded that the pharmacist’s actions fell significantly short of professional standards, undermining public trust and confidence in the pharmacy profession. Dishonesty, especially concerning controlled drugs, is considered a severe breach of integrity. Given the attitudinal nature of the failings and the lack of demonstrated remediation, removal from the register was deemed the only proportionate response.

Learning Points

  • Integrity is Paramount: Dishonesty, particularly involving controlled drugs, fundamentally breaches the trust required in pharmacy professionals.
  • Accountability: Maintaining accurate records and raising concerns promptly are critical to ensuring patient safety and professional responsibility.
  • Remediation: Insight and proactive steps to address professional failings are essential in maintaining fitness to practise.

The full determination, including detailed findings and sanctions, underscores the importance of compliance with GPhC standards and the need for pharmacists to uphold the highest professional and ethical standards.

Original Case Document

The full determination transcript is available to logged in users.

Log in or register for free to access.

Leave a Reply