Pharmacist Found Responsible for Unsafe Practices in Online Pharmacy Operations

The GPhC Fitness to Practise Committee reviewed the case of a pharmacist, referred to here as “the registrant,” who was the Superintendent Pharmacist (SI) and Responsible Pharmacist (RP) for an online pharmacy. The case involved significant governance failures, particularly concerning the supply of high-risk medications through inadequate prescribing practices and insufficient safeguards.

---

Allegations and Proven Findings

1. Inadequate Identity Verification Systems:
   • The pharmacy lacked proper identity checks, increasing the risk of fraudulent access to medications.
2. Unsafe Online Prescribing Practices:
   • The pharmacy allowed patients to select medications and quantities before undergoing consultations.
   • Patients could amend their answers to bypass restrictions, compromising clinical judgment.
3. Failure to Mitigate Risks:
   • Over 44,000 prescriptions for high-risk medications (e.g., opioids and Z-drugs) were dispensed without appropriate oversight.
4. Association with Non-Compliant Prescribers:
   • The registrant worked with a prescriber operating outside UK regulatory oversight, attempting to avoid compliance with Care Quality Commission guidelines.
5. Neglect of Professional Standards:
   • The registrant failed to implement necessary safeguards and monitoring to ensure patient safety, particularly for vulnerable individuals.

---

Fitness to Practise Findings

The Committee determined that the registrant’s actions:

• Compromised Patient Safety: Inadequate safeguards led to unsafe supplies of medications, putting patients at risk of harm.
• Breached Professional Integrity: The registrant prioritized commercial gains over compliance with ethical and professional standards.
• Demonstrated a Lack of Leadership: As both SI and RP, the registrant was responsible for implementing robust governance systems but failed to do so.

While the registrant acknowledged some failings and cooperated with the investigation, the severity of the breaches warranted regulatory action.

---

Outcome and Sanctions

The GPhC issued a warning to the registrant and imposed conditions on the pharmacy’s operations to address the identified risks. These conditions included:

• Implementation of a robust identity verification system.
• Improved oversight of online prescribing practices, including regular audits.
• Suspension of high-risk medication supply until appropriate safeguards were in place.

The warning will remain on the registrant’s record for 12 months, serving as a reminder of their obligations to uphold professional standards.

---

Key Learning Points for Pharmacy Professionals

1. Robust Safeguards are Essential: Pharmacies must implement rigorous systems to prevent misuse and protect patient safety.
2. Adherence to Regulatory Guidance: Online and distance services require strict compliance with GPhC and GMC prescribing standards.
3. Leadership and Accountability: Pharmacists in leadership roles must prioritize governance and patient safety over commercial pressures.
4. Proactive Risk Management: Pharmacies should regularly review and update their practices to meet evolving regulatory requirements.