Pharmacist Suspended for Supplying Controlled Drugs Without Valid Prescriptions

Date of Decision: July 6, 2023

Registrant's Role: Pharmacist

Allegations:

  • Supplied controlled drugs to Patient A without a valid prescription on various occasions between August 2018 and February 2019.
  • Supplied a controlled drug on February 23, 2018, without the form of the medication specified in the prescription.
  • Supplied a controlled drug on April 10, 2018, where the prescription lacked the quantity in words and figures and the drug name.
  • Supplied a controlled drug on December 9, 2018, using an expired prescription dated November 25, 2014.
  • Failed to adequately investigate the genuineness of Patient A's prescriptions between January 2018 and February 2019.

Outcome: Suspension (6 months) with no review

GPhC Standards Breached:

  • Standard 1 - Pharmacy professionals must provide person-centred care.
  • Standard 2 โ€“ Pharmacy professionals must work in partnership with others.
  • Standard 3 โ€“ Pharmacy professionals must communicate effectively.
  • Standard 5 โ€“ Pharmacy professionals must use their professional judgement.
  • Standard 6 โ€“ Pharmacy professionals must behave in a professional manner.
  • Standard 9 โ€“ Pharmacy professionals must demonstrate leadership.

Case Summary

In a recent determination by the General Pharmaceutical Council’s Fitness to Practise Committee, a pharmacist was suspended for six months after admitting to multiple instances of misconduct. The pharmacist, who was the Superintendent and Responsible Pharmacist at Avantgarde Pharma Ltd, trading as Al-Shafa Pharmacy, supplied controlled drugs to a patient without valid prescriptions over a period from January 2018 to February 2019. The misconduct included dispensing drugs based on prescriptions that lacked necessary details such as dosage, form, and were even expired. Despite the pharmacist’s admission and reflection on the misconduct, the Committee found that the actions posed a significant risk to public safety and undermined public confidence in the pharmacy profession.

The Committee’s findings highlighted serious breaches of the GPhC’s standards, including failing to provide person-centred care, not working effectively with other healthcare professionals, and not using professional judgment. The pharmacist’s failure to identify and act on obvious red flags in the prescriptions was deemed a serious lapse in professional conduct.

The determination emphasized the importance of pharmacists adhering to the Misuse of Drugs Regulations and maintaining the integrity of the profession by ensuring that controlled drugs are dispensed only with valid prescriptions. The pharmacist’s actions were found to have potentially facilitated the misuse of controlled drugs, although no direct harm to the patient was evidenced.

The sanction of a six-month suspension reflects the seriousness of the misconduct and serves as a deterrent to other professionals. The Committee decided against a review hearing, acknowledging the pharmacist’s insight and remediation efforts. However, the suspension underscores the necessity of upholding professional standards and maintaining public trust in the pharmacy profession.

Continue Reading the Full Case

Create a free account or log in to access the complete case summary.

  • Full allegations considered by the GPhC
  • Panel findings and reasoning
  • Outcome of the investigation
  • Sanctions considered and imposed on the Pharmacist
  • Key professional learning points

Register for Free or Log In

Original Case Document

View the Full Determination Document

The original determination transcript is available to registered users.

  • Download the official GPhC determination
  • Full hearing transcript
  • Detailed findings of fact
  • Sanction reasoning
  • Details of the pharmacy professionals involved

Register for Free or Log In

Leave a Reply