Pharmacist Suspended for Misconduct Involving Unauthorized Medication Orders and Private Prescriptions
Date of Decision: October 5, 2023
Registrant's Role: Pharmacist
Outcome: Suspension (4 months) with a review
GPhC Standards Breached: Standard 1 – Pharmacy professionals must provide person-centred care Standard 2 – Pharmacy professionals must work in partnership with others Standard 3 – Pharmacy professionals must communicate effectively Standard 4 – Pharmacy professionals must maintain, develop and use their professional knowledge and skills Standard 5 – Pharmacy professionals must use their professional judgement Standard 6 – Pharmacy professionals must behave in a professional manner Standard 9 – Pharmacy professionals must demonstrate leadership
Case Summary
In a recent determination by the General Pharmaceutical Council’s Fitness to Practise Committee, a pharmacist was found guilty of misconduct and suspended for four months. The case involved several serious allegations, including unauthorized ordering of medication using the Pharmacy’s PMR system, taking stock without payment or adequate audit trail, issuing private prescriptions without permission or indemnity insurance, and charging patients fees for these prescriptions without authorization. The pharmacist admitted to all allegations, and the Committee found that these actions amounted to misconduct, impairing the pharmacist’s fitness to practise.
The Committee determined that the pharmacist’s actions breached several GPhC standards, including those requiring pharmacy professionals to provide person-centred care, work in partnership with others, communicate effectively, maintain professional knowledge and skills, use professional judgment, behave professionally, and demonstrate leadership. The pharmacist’s conduct was deemed to have brought the profession into disrepute and breached fundamental principles of pharmacy practice.
The determination emphasized the seriousness of the misconduct, particularly the dishonest actions taken for personal financial gain. Despite the pharmacist’s efforts to demonstrate insight and remediation, the Committee found that the pharmacist had not fully reflected on the reasons for the dishonest conduct, which raised concerns about the risk of repetition.
As a result, the Committee decided that a suspension was necessary to protect the public, maintain public confidence in the profession, and uphold professional standards. The suspension will allow the pharmacist time to reflect further on the misconduct and take steps to ensure it is not repeated. The Committee also outlined expectations for further self-reflection and learning before the review hearing.
This case serves as a reminder to pharmacy professionals of the importance of adhering to professional standards and the potential consequences of failing to do so. It highlights the need for transparency, honesty, and integrity in all aspects of pharmacy practice, as well as the importance of maintaining proper documentation and following established procedures.
Original Case Document
The full determination transcript is available to logged in users.
Log in or register for free to access.