Pharmacist Suspended for Attempting to Extract Patient Data
Date of Decision: October 11, 2023
Registrant's Role: Pharmacist
Outcome: Suspension for 8 months with review
GPhC Standards Breached: Standard 5 - Use their professional judgement Standard 6 - Behave in a professional manner Standard 7 - Respect and maintain the person’s confidentiality and privacy
Case Summary
In a recent determination by the General Pharmaceutical Council’s Fitness to Practise Committee, a pharmacist was found guilty of misconduct and suspended for eight months. The case centered around an incident on June 13, 2021, when the pharmacist attempted to extract and transfer sensitive patient data from a Tesco Pharmacy computer onto a personal USB device. The pharmacist admitted to the allegations, acknowledging that their actions were dishonest and lacked clinical justification.
The Committee’s findings highlighted the seriousness of the misconduct, noting that the pharmacist’s actions breached several GPhC standards, including the use of professional judgment, maintaining professional behavior, and respecting patient confidentiality. The pharmacist’s attempts to download patient data were described as premeditated and involved manually copying NHS numbers for at least 97 patients.
The GPhC determined that the pharmacist’s fitness to practise was impaired, citing risks to patient confidentiality and public trust in the profession. The Committee emphasized the importance of honesty and integrity in maintaining public confidence in pharmacy professionals. Despite the pharmacist’s remorse and efforts to remediate through training and reflection, the Committee concluded that the risk of repetition remained due to limited insight into the motivations behind the misconduct.
As a sanction, the pharmacist was suspended for eight months, with a review to assess their understanding of the misconduct and its implications. The Committee also imposed an interim suspension order to protect the public and uphold public confidence during any potential appeal period.
This case serves as a critical reminder to pharmacy professionals about the importance of adhering to data protection laws and maintaining the highest standards of integrity. It underscores the severe consequences of breaching patient confidentiality and the need for continuous reflection and understanding of professional responsibilities.
Original Case Document
The full determination transcript is available to logged in users.
Log in or register for free to access.