Pharmacist’s Fitness to Practise Review: Insight and Remediation Lead to Lifting of Suspension

Date of Decision: February 1, 2024

Registrant's Role: Pharmacist

Outcome: Not impaired

GPhC Standards Breached: Standard 1: Provide person-centred care Standard 2: Work in partnership with others Standard 5: Use professional judgement Standard 8: Speak up when they have concerns or when things go wrong Standard 9: Demonstrate leadership

Case Summary

In a recent review hearing, the General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) Fitness to Practise Committee evaluated the case of a pharmacist who had previously been suspended due to serious misconduct. The pharmacist, who served as the Superintendent Pharmacist (SI) at a pharmacy, was found to have failed in implementing robust procedures for dispensing high-risk medications, such as opioids and z-drugs, and did not ensure that the pharmacy’s services were covered by appropriate indemnity insurance. These failures led to a suspension order for nine months, as the pharmacist’s actions were deemed to have brought the profession into disrepute and posed a risk to patient safety.

During the review hearing, the Committee assessed whether the pharmacist’s fitness to practise remained impaired. The pharmacist presented evidence of having undertaken significant remediation efforts, including completing CPD training, shadowing another SI, and providing a reflective report. Despite initial concerns about the depth of insight demonstrated in the reflective report, the pharmacist’s oral evidence during the hearing showed improved understanding of the responsibilities and challenges associated with the SI role.

The Committee noted that the pharmacist had complied with the suspension order and had taken steps to address the previous shortcomings. The pharmacist’s commitment to patient safety and professional standards was further supported by testimonials from colleagues. The Committee concluded that the pharmacist had developed sufficient insight and understanding to ensure that past failings would not be repeated.

As a result, the Committee determined that the pharmacist’s fitness to practise was no longer impaired, allowing the suspension to be lifted upon its expiration. This case highlights the importance of continuous professional development, reflection, and adherence to regulatory standards for pharmacy professionals. It serves as a reminder of the critical role pharmacists play in safeguarding public health and maintaining trust in the profession.

Original Case Document

The full determination transcript is available to logged in users.

Log in or register for free to access.

Leave a Reply