Pharmacist Removed from GPhC Register After Conviction for Fraud and Supplying Controlled Drugs
Date of Decision: April 14, 2023
Registrant's Role: Pharmacist
Allegations:
- On 13 September 2021, the pharmacist was convicted at Isleworth Crown Court of:
- Fraud by abuse of position, contrary to sections 1 and 4 of the Fraud Act 2006.
- Being concerned in supplying a controlled drug (Class B) contrary to section 4(3)(b) of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971.
- The pharmacist supplied over 2,000 bottles of codeine linctus and Phenergan over a period of more than a year.
- Initially, the pharmacist refused sales but later complied after being coerced and threatened by a group of men who:
- Threatened harm to him and his family.
- Showed him weapons and warned that his family was under surveillance.
- After the employer confronted him about excessive stock orders, the pharmacist initially claimed the sales were legitimate before later admitting to being coerced.
- The pharmacist was sentenced to 12 months imprisonment (suspended for 18 months) and 200 hours of community service.
Outcome: Removal from the GPhC register
GPhC Standards Breached:
- Standard 2 โ Work in Partnership with Others
- Standard 8 โ Speak Up When Things Go Wrong
- Standard 9 โ Demonstrate Leadership
Case Summary
The General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) Fitness to Practise Committee investigated a pharmacist following his conviction for fraud and supplying controlled drugs.
Between May 2018 and June 2019, while working as a pharmacy manager at Golborne Pharmacy, the pharmacist:
Continue Reading the Full Case
Create a free account or log in to access the complete case summary.
- Full allegations considered by the GPhC
- Panel findings and reasoning
- Outcome of the investigation
- Sanctions considered and imposed on the Pharmacist
- Key professional learning points
Original Case Document
View the Full Determination Document
The original determination transcript is available to registered users.
- Download the official GPhC determination
- Full hearing transcript
- Detailed findings of fact
- Sanction reasoning
- Details of the pharmacy professionals involved
