Pharmacist Issued Formal Warning for Dishonesty Regarding Accreditation for MUR and NMS Services

Date of Decision: June 10, 2021

Registrant's Role: Pharmacist

Allegations:

  • The pharmacist falsely declared on an online locum booking system (Venloc) on 21 August 2018 that she was accredited to conduct:
  • Medicines Use Reviews (MURs)
  • New Medicine Services (NMS)
  • In October 2018, while working for Lloyds Pharmacy, she:
  • Informed a colleague she could not perform MURs due to lack of accreditation.
  • Was confronted by the area manager, during which she falsely claimed to have completed accreditation on 11 October 2018.
  • Emailed Venloc later that day, stating she had mistakenly selected β€œyes” regarding accreditation, but this was also found to be untrue.
  • The pharmacist later admitted dishonesty, explaining she panicked and lied when confronted.

Outcome: A formal warning was issued

GPhC Standards Breached:

  • Standard 6 – Behave in a Professional Manner
  • Standard 9 – Demonstrate Leadership

Case Summary

The General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) Fitness to Practise Committee investigated a pharmacist after she was found to have falsely declared her accreditation for conducting Medicines Use Reviews (MURs) and New Medicine Services (NMS) while working as a locum pharmacist for Lloyds Pharmacy.

On 21 August 2018, while registering on Venloc (a locum workforce management platform), she:

    Continue Reading the Full Case

    Create a free account or log in to access the complete case summary.

    • Full allegations considered by the GPhC
    • Panel findings and reasoning
    • Outcome of the investigation
    • Sanctions considered and imposed on the Pharmacist
    • Key professional learning points

    Register for Free or Log In

    Original Case Document

    View the Full Determination Document

    The original determination transcript is available to registered users.

    • Download the official GPhC determination
    • Full hearing transcript
    • Detailed findings of fact
    • Sanction reasoning
    • Details of the pharmacy professionals involved

    Register for Free or Log In

    Leave a Reply