Pharmacist Removed from GPhC Register Following Conviction for Making Indecent Images of Children

Date of Decision: November 29, 2019

Registrant's Role: Pharmacist

Allegations:

  • Conviction for making indecent images of children:
  • Two still Category A images
  • Four still Category B images
  • Four still Category C images

Outcome: Removal from the GPhC register

GPhC Standards Breached:

  • Standard 6 – Pharmacy professionals must behave in a professional manner, demonstrating integrity, empathy, and respect, and maintaining public trust both within and outside of professional settings.

Case Summary

Allegations

The General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) Fitness to Practise Committee convened a hearing to assess the fitness to practise of a registered pharmacist (hereafter referred to as “the registrant”) following a criminal conviction. The registrant had been convicted of three counts of making indecent images of children, contrary to section 1(1)(a) of the Protection of Children Act 1978. These images included two classified as Category A (the most severe), four Category B, and four Category C.

The convictions arose from a police investigation initiated in 2014. A warrant was executed at the registrant’s home, which was linked to internet activity involving the download of indecent images. A forensic analysis of a laptop found at the premises revealed the illicit material and a user profile that aligned with the registrant.

Continue Reading the Full Case

Create a free account or log in to access the complete case summary.

  • Full allegations considered by the GPhC
  • Panel findings and reasoning
  • Outcome of the investigation
  • Sanctions considered and imposed on the Pharmacist
  • Key professional learning points

Register for Free or Log In

Original Case Document

View the Full Determination Document

The original determination transcript is available to registered users.

  • Download the official GPhC determination
  • Full hearing transcript
  • Detailed findings of fact
  • Sanction reasoning
  • Details of the pharmacy professionals involved

Register for Free or Log In

Leave a Reply