Locum Community Pharmacist Suspended for Falling Asleep in the Pharmacy and Intimidating GPhC Investigation Patient
Date of Decision: July 16, 2025
Registrant's Role: Pharmacist
Allegations:
- Fell asleep in the dispensary on the morning of 2 July 2022 while acting as Responsible Pharmacist.
- Fell asleep in the consultation room on the afternoon of 2 July 2022, leaving the pharmacy unattended and open to the public for over 20 minutes.
- Accessed Patient A's address between 2 July 2022 and 31 January 2023 and noted it outside clinical records.
- Attended Patient A’s home on 31 January 2023 and attempted to dissuade her from engaging with a GPhC investigation.
- Conduct in attending Patient A’s home with intent to dissuade her from cooperation with GPhC investigation demonstrated a lack of integrity.
Outcome: Suspension – one month
GPhC Standards Breached:
- Standard 5 – Use professional judgement: Practise only when fit to do so.
- Standard 6 – Behave professionally: Maintain appropriate professional boundaries and behave in a way that maintains public trust.
- Standard 7 – Respect and maintain confidentiality and privacy.
Case Summary
Allegations
The case revolves around a series of serious professional lapses by the registrant, a pharmacist, while working as the Responsible Pharmacist at Noor Pharmacy in Birmingham. The panel considered a range of misconduct allegations. Chief among these were two episodes of falling asleep while on duty—one in the dispensary in the morning and another in the consultation room in the afternoon of 2 July 2022. These lapses led to the pharmacy being left open and unattended, thereby placing public safety at risk.
Equally troubling was the registrant’s action of accessing and noting down a patient’s address—Patient A—outside of clinical records, which he admitted to doing. Most significantly, on 31 January 2023, he visited Patient A’s home after becoming aware of a formal complaint she made to the GPhC. Though he initially described the visit as coincidental and intended as an apology, the panel concluded that the visit was premeditated with the intention to dissuade her from engaging with the regulatory investigation.
Continue Reading the Full Case
Create a free account or log in to access the complete case summary.
- Full allegations considered by the GPhC
- Panel findings and reasoning
- Outcome of the investigation
- Sanctions considered and imposed on the Pharmacist
- Key professional learning points
Original Case Document
View the Full Determination Document
The original determination transcript is available to registered users.
- Download the official GPhC determination
- Full hearing transcript
- Detailed findings of fact
- Sanction reasoning
- Details of the pharmacy professionals involved
