“F*** the Restraining Order”: Pharmacist Removed from Register After Repeated Breaches of Restraining Order

Date of Decision: August 13, 2025

Registrant's Role: Pharmacist

Allegations:

  • Convicted on 1 and 14 March 2024 of eight counts of Harassment – Breach of Restraining Order at Cardiff Magistrates’ Court.

Outcome: Removal from the Register (with immediate interim suspension)

GPhC Standards Breached:

  • Standard 5 – Pharmacy professionals must use professional judgement
  • Standard 6 – Pharmacy professionals must behave in a professional manner

Case Summary

Allegations

This case concerned a pharmacist who was found guilty of eight breaches of a Restraining Order originally imposed in 2018 following a conviction for assault and criminal damage involving his ex-partner. The Restraining Order prohibited all forms of direct and indirect contact and specific references to the ex-partner online or electronically.

In February and March 2024, the registrant repeatedly violated the terms of this order. Incidents included attending the ex-partner’s residence multiple times, deflating her car tyres, calling her workplace, and contacting her over 36 times in one day. These actions occurred while a child, his son, was involved and emotionally impacted. The registrant made statements such as “see what I did” and showed little remorse during his police interview, declaring “Fuck the Restraining Order” and later saying he felt “marvellous” about the matter.

Continue Reading the Full Case

Create a free account or log in to access the complete case summary.

  • Full allegations considered by the GPhC
  • Panel findings and reasoning
  • Outcome of the investigation
  • Sanctions considered and imposed on the Pharmacist
  • Key professional learning points

Register for Free or Log In

Original Case Document

View the Full Determination Document

The original determination transcript is available to registered users.

  • Download the official GPhC determination
  • Full hearing transcript
  • Detailed findings of fact
  • Sanction reasoning
  • Details of the pharmacy professionals involved

Register for Free or Log In

Leave a Reply