Pharmacist Suspended for Unsafe Remote Prescribing of High-Risk Medicines

Date of Decision: August 28, 2025

Registrant's Role: Pharmacist

Allegations:

  • Prescribed over 3,000 high-risk prescriptions through online pharmacies without proper clinical assessments.
  • Relied solely on online questionnaires without face-to-face or virtual consultations.
  • Failed to access GP or specialist records, compromising patient safety.
  • Issued prescriptions for controlled drugs (e.g., opioids, z-drugs) inappropriately and without due consideration of dependence or misuse.
  • Approved repeat prescriptions for patients with signs of drug-seeking behaviour.
  • Failed to refer patients to their GPs or implement safety netting.
  • Demonstrated a transactional approach to prescribing rather than one based on clinical need or UK prescribing guidance.

Outcome: Four-month suspension with a review; immediate interim suspension ordered.

GPhC Standards Breached:

  • Standard 1 – Person-centred care: Failed to put the care of individuals first by not conducting appropriate assessments.
  • Standard 2 – Partnership working: Did not collaborate with GPs or other professionals.
  • Standard 4 – Professional judgement: Exercised poor judgment in issuing high-risk medications based solely on questionnaires.
  • Standard 6 – Communication: Did not engage in any form of meaningful patient communication or follow-up.
  • Standard 7 – Confidentiality and privacy: Failed to properly safeguard patient data and history by neglecting to access GP records.
  • Standard 8 – Speaking up about concerns: Did not challenge unsafe prescribing models or raise concerns.
  • Standard 9 – Leadership: Did not act as a responsible professional despite having the autonomy to make prescribing decisions.

Case Summary

Allegations

This case concerned serious concerns about a pharmacist’s practice in online prescribing roles at two remote pharmacies: Instant E-Care Ltd and UK Meds Online Ltd. Between May 2019 and January 2020, the registrant issued a combined total of over 4,300 prescriptions, including high-risk medicines such as opioids (codeine, dihydrocodeine), z-drugs (zopiclone, zolpidem), modafinil, antidepressants (sertraline, citalopram), and other medications requiring ongoing monitoring.

Allegations centred on the registrant’s over-reliance on online questionnaires, lack of any virtual or in-person consultations, failure to verify medical histories, and failure to contact patients’ GPs. The prescribing was done in a transactional manner, often in the absence of any safety netting or professional judgment grounded in established clinical guidance.

Continue Reading the Full Case

Create a free account or log in to access the complete case summary.

  • Full allegations considered by the GPhC
  • Panel findings and reasoning
  • Outcome of the investigation
  • Sanctions considered and imposed on the Pharmacist
  • Key professional learning points

Register for Free or Log In

Original Case Document

View the Full Determination Document

The original determination transcript is available to registered users.

  • Download the official GPhC determination
  • Full hearing transcript
  • Detailed findings of fact
  • Sanction reasoning
  • Details of the pharmacy professionals involved

Register for Free or Log In

Leave a Reply