Locum Pharmacist Suspended After Administering Shingles Vaccine to Child Under Wrong PGD at Well Pharmacy

Date of Decision: August 28, 2025

Registrant's Role: Pharmacist

Allegations:

  • Administered Zostavax (a shingles vaccine intended for adults) to a 2-year-old child instead of the prescribed Varivax (chickenpox vaccine)
  • Failed to check the child’s name and date of birth before administering the vaccine
  • Did not obtain informed consent from the child’s mother
  • Did not explain the risks associated with the vaccine
  • Administered a vaccine not covered by a Patient Group Direction (PGD)
  • Inserted the same needle multiple times into the child's arm during vaccination
  • Failed to review the relevant PGD before the appointment
  • Acted outside his scope of competence (not an independent prescriber and lacked training)
  • Did not make an adequate clinical record of the appointment

Outcome: Suspension – 4 months (with immediate interim suspension)

GPhC Standards Breached:

  • Standard 1 – Pharmacy professionals must provide person-centred care
  • Standard 3 – Pharmacy professionals must communicate effectively
  • Standard 4 – Pharmacy professionals must maintain, develop and use their professional knowledge and skills
  • Standard 5 – Pharmacy professionals must use their professional judgement
  • Standard 8 – Pharmacy professionals must speak up when things go wrong
  • Standard 9 – Pharmacy professionals must demonstrate leadership

Case Summary

Allegations

In a disturbing and highly consequential case for pharmacy professionals, a pharmacist was found to have administered the wrong vaccine—a shingles vaccine (Zostavax) intended for older adults—to a 2-year-old child instead of the intended chickenpox vaccine (Varivax). The incident occurred while the registrant was working as a locum at Well Pharmacy in Plymouth.

The circumstances leading to the incident reveal a cascade of procedural failures:

Continue Reading the Full Case

Create a free account or log in to access the complete case summary.

  • Full allegations considered by the GPhC
  • Panel findings and reasoning
  • Outcome of the investigation
  • Sanctions considered and imposed on the Pharmacist
  • Key professional learning points

Register for Free or Log In

Original Case Document

View the Full Determination Document

The original determination transcript is available to registered users.

  • Download the official GPhC determination
  • Full hearing transcript
  • Detailed findings of fact
  • Sanction reasoning
  • Details of the pharmacy professionals involved

Register for Free or Log In

Leave a Reply