Emergency Contraception Refusal Due to Religious Beliefs Leads to Warning for Lloydspharmacy Locum Pharmacist
Date of Decision: September 25, 2025
Registrant's Role: Pharmacist
Allegations:
- Refused to supply emergency contraception (EHC) to a patient.
- Actions were based on personal religious beliefs.
- Failed to offer the patient use of the consultation room, instead discussing the matter in the open pharmacy area.
Outcome: Warning (no finding of impairment)
GPhC Standards Breached:
- Standard 1 – Pharmacy professionals must provide person-centred care: Failure to use the consultation room did not respect the patient's dignity.
- Standard 7 – Pharmacy professionals must respect and maintain a person’s confidentiality and privacy: Discussing a sensitive issue in a public area showed inadequate consideration of the patient’s privacy.
Case Summary
Allegations
The case revolved around an incident on 24 July 2022, when the registrant, working as a locum Responsible Pharmacist at a Lloyds Pharmacy situated within a supermarket, refused to supply emergency hormonal contraception (EHC), also known as the “morning after pill”, to a patient. The refusal was explicitly based on the registrant’s personal religious beliefs. The central concern was not the refusal itself — which is permissible under GPhC guidance if handled appropriately — but rather how the situation was managed.
The concern was brought to the GPhC’s attention not by the patient, but by a pharmacy dispenser colleague, Ms G, who submitted an online concern form on the same evening of the incident. Ms G alleged the registrant had acted unprofessionally, particularly due to handling the EHC request in the open pharmacy area. Her report triggered a formal GPhC fitness to practise investigation. Another colleague, Ms A, also gave significant testimony during the hearing, which supported the claim that the registrant failed to adequately protect the patient’s privacy and dignity.
Continue Reading the Full Case
Create a free account or log in to access the complete case summary.
- Full allegations considered by the GPhC
- Panel findings and reasoning
- Outcome of the investigation
- Sanctions considered and imposed on the Pharmacist
- Key professional learning points
Original Case Document
View the Full Determination Document
The original determination transcript is available to registered users.
- Download the official GPhC determination
- Full hearing transcript
- Detailed findings of fact
- Sanction reasoning
- Details of the pharmacy professionals involved
