Repeated Criminal Offences and Dishonesty Lead to Pharmacist’s Removal from GPhC Register
Date of Decision: February 6, 2018
Registrant's Role: Pharmacist
Allegations:
- Received a police caution for two theft offences
- Failed to declare the caution to the GPhC within 7 days
- Dishonestly answered โnoโ to registration renewal questions regarding criminal history
- Convicted of driving without insurance and a valid licence
- Failed to declare multiple convictions, including:
- Theft of clothing
- Multiple food hygiene breaches as a food business owner
- Theft from employer and possession of Class C controlled drugs (Subutex and Prefibin)
- Dishonesty in multiple GPhC declarations, intending to conceal caution and convictions
Outcome: Removal from the GPhC register
GPhC Standards Breached:
- Standard 6.1 โ Act with honesty and integrity to maintain public trust and confidence in the profession
- Standard 6.5 โ Meet accepted standards of personal and professional conduct
- Standard 6.6 โ Comply with legal and professional requirements and accepted guidance on professional practice
- Standard 6.9 โ Promptly tell the regulator, your employer and relevant authorities about anything that may mean you are not fit to practise or that may damage the reputation of the pharmacy profession
Case Summary
Allegations
The registrant, a pharmacist, faced numerous allegations relating to criminal conduct and repeated failures to disclose caution and convictions to the General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC). The offences spanned a wide timeframe and included:
Continue Reading the Full Case
Create a free account or log in to access the complete case summary.
- Full allegations considered by the GPhC
- Panel findings and reasoning
- Outcome of the investigation
- Sanctions considered and imposed on the Pharmacist
- Key professional learning points
Original Case Document
View the Full Determination Document
The original determination transcript is available to registered users.
- Download the official GPhC determination
- Full hearing transcript
- Detailed findings of fact
- Sanction reasoning
- Details of the pharmacy professionals involved
