Online Prescribing Under Scrutiny: Six-Month Conditions Imposed After 62,000+ Questionnaire-Based Prescriptions

Date of Decision: February 12, 2026

Registrant's Role: Pharmacist

Allegations:

  • Prescribing medicines on 62,689 occasions using an online questionnaire-based model.
  • Prescribing high-risk medicines on 4,859 occasions via the same model.
  • Failing to prescribe in accordance with relevant GMC, RPS and GPhC guidance, including:
  • Not obtaining adequate patient health information before prescribing.
  • Relying primarily on unverified online questionnaire responses.
  • Failing to access or attempt to access GP or specialist records.
  • Not requesting face-to-face consultations where clinically indicated.
  • Failing to consider medication dependence or misuse.
  • Not referring patients back to their GP for appropriate monitoring.
  • Failing to implement adequate safety-netting.
  • Prescribing within a model incapable of supporting safe prescribing decisions, including a questionnaire system that could be manipulated by patients.
  • Prescribing at volumes and speeds that were insufficient to allow proper clinical evaluation, with over 40,000 prescriptions issued in under three minutes.
  • Specific unsafe prescribing incidents, including:
  • 28 tablets of propranolol 10mg.
  • 84 tablets of amitriptyline 50mg.
  • Repeated supplies of amitriptyline 25mg and 50mg and propranolol 40mg to individual patients without adequate safeguards.
  • Prescribing medicines including Z drugs, opioids, modafinil, amitriptyline, propranolol, carbamazepine, orlistat/Xenical, promethazine, metformin and salbutamol (Ventolin) via questionnaire when unsuitable for such a model.
  • Adopting a transactional approach to prescribing.
  • As Clinical Lead, failing to ensure safe prescribing standards among other prescribers in respect of approximately 14,259 high-risk prescriptions.

Outcome: The previous 12-month suspension was replaced with a 6-month Conditions of Practice Order

GPhC Standards Breached:

  • Standard 1 โ€“ Provide person-centred care
  • Standard 2 โ€“ Work in partnership with others
  • Standard 4 โ€“ Maintain, develop and use professional knowledge and skills
  • Standard 5 โ€“ Use professional judgement
  • Standard 6 โ€“ Behave in a professional manner
  • Standard 7 โ€“ Respect and maintain patient confidentiality
  • Standard 9 โ€“ Demonstrate leadership

Case Summary

Allegations

This case concerned extremely high-volume online prescribing carried out by the registrant while working as a Pharmacist Independent Prescriber and later as Clinical Lead for an online provider. Over a period spanning November 2019 to July 2022, the registrant issued 62,689 prescriptions using a questionnaire-based model, including 4,859 for high-risk medicines.

Of particular concern was the speed of prescribing: more than 40,000 prescriptions were generated in under three minutes. The Committee considered that such timeframes were fundamentally incompatible with safe, individualised clinical assessment.

Continue Reading the Full Case

Create a free account or log in to access the complete case summary.

  • Full allegations considered by the GPhC
  • Panel findings and reasoning
  • Outcome of the investigation
  • Sanctions considered and imposed on the Pharmacist
  • Key professional learning points

Register for Free or Log In

Original Case Document

View the Full Determination Document

The original determination transcript is available to registered users.

  • Download the official GPhC determination
  • Full hearing transcript
  • Detailed findings of fact
  • Sanction reasoning
  • Details of the pharmacy professionals involved

Register for Free or Log In

Leave a Reply