Pharmacist’s Extensive Controlled Drug Errors and Unsafe Dispensing Lead to Conditions Order
Date of Decision: July 3, 2018
Registrant's Role: Pharmacist
Allegations:
- Between August 2016 and February 2017, the registrant worked at a community pharmacy and demonstrated repeated failures in handling and recording Controlled Drugs (CDs).
- Failed to accurately record supply of MST (morphine sulfate) 15mg modified-release tablets.
- Supplied incorrect strengths of MST and made incorrect CD register entries, including incorrect balances.
- Failed to correct CD register errors.
- Supplied incorrect quantities of methadone and dispensed against an expired prescription.
- Supplied incorrect methadone quantities and inaccurately recorded them in the CD register.
- Behaved aggressively towards a manager during a workplace discussion.
- Failed on multiple occasions to make accurate CD register entries for methadone (missing or incorrect patient, prescriber, date, ID, and pharmacist details).
- Dispensed incorrect strength morphine capsules and failed to update CD register after correction.
- Supplied incorrect strength and quantity of Zomorph and failed to record in CD register.
- Failed to maintain accurate CD records for Zomorph on multiple occasions.
- Incorrectly recorded receipt of Matrifen patches, leading to inaccurate CD balance.
- Supplied Concerta XL against an expired prescription.
- Failed to record delivery of Zomorph capsules.
- Incorrectly recorded Concerta supply in CD register.
- Supplied buprenorphine with incorrect labelling (200mcg labelled as 2mg).
- Failed to record delivery of Zomorph CDs.
- Incorrectly labelled Equasym XL capsules.
- Failed to accurately record multiple CD supplies including Concerta, Tranquilyn, and Sevredol.
- Failed to securely store CDs (Concerta XL not kept in locked cabinet).
- Poor dispensary management including unrecorded CDs, unattended stock, and incomplete documentation.
Outcome: A conditions of practice order was imposed for 9 months, alongside an interim conditions order.
GPhC Standards Breached:
- Standard 1.6 – Do your best to provide medicines and other professional services safely and when patients need them
- Standard 1.8 – Keep full and accurate records of the professional services you provide in a clear and legible form
- Standard 6.6 – Comply with legal and professional requirements and accepted guidance on professional practice
- Standard 6.9 – Promptly tell relevant authorities about anything that may affect your fitness to practise
- Standard 7.6 – Ensure appropriate standard operating procedures are in place and followed
- Standard 7.7 – Ensure workload or working conditions do not present a risk to patient care or public safety
Case Summary
Allegations
This case concerns a pharmacist whose practice between August 2016 and February 2017 was marked by a significant number of serious dispensing and Controlled Drug (CD) management errors. The allegations highlight widespread failures in handling high-risk medicines, including opioids such as methadone, morphine (MST and Zomorph), buprenorphine, and fentanyl patches (Matrifen).
The registrant repeatedly made errors in CD register entries, including incorrect quantities, strengths, and balances. There were also failures to record supplies altogether, which is a critical legal requirement under CD regulations. Several dispensing errors involved incorrect strengths—such as supplying 10mg morphine instead of 60mg—and incorrect quantities of methadone, a drug with a narrow therapeutic index and high risk of harm if misused.
Continue Reading the Full Case
Create a free account or log in to access the complete case summary.
- Full allegations considered by the GPhC
- Panel findings and reasoning
- Outcome of the investigation
- Sanctions considered and imposed on the Pharmacist
- Key professional learning points
Original Case Document
View the Full Determination Document
The original determination transcript is available to registered users.
- Download the official GPhC determination
- Full hearing transcript
- Detailed findings of fact
- Sanction reasoning
- Details of the pharmacy professionals involved
