I’ve recently published an analysis on LinkedIn discussing the systemic risk emerging from the rollout of the Single Patient Record (SPR) framework. I wanted to share it with the members of PLEA.
The post analyzes the stark regulatory mismatch on the frontline: a GP registrar logging a benchmark of 1,500+ supervised hours to manage complex history-taking, compared to the statutory minimum 90-hour baseline for pharmacist independent prescribers.
When you introduce full ‘write-access’ to a national database under intense retail task-switching conditions, a flawed electronic entry isn’t just a local issue anymore—it permanently alters the national clinical record.
I believe this highlighting of real-world legal and clinical exposure is vital for final-year students and junior pharmacists to understand before they register. I would highly value your law and ethics perspective on this.
If the text resonates with you, please drop a comment to share your insights

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/pranay-kotak_clinicalgovernance-patientsafety-singlepatientrecord-share-7468204696671944705–tN9/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_android&rcm=ACoAAACmdlQBUusBrU6dn6xvaFA2pIYW8xxx6M4