Registrant Removed Following Dishonest Conduct and Clinical Errors

Date of Decision: December 23, 2024

Registrant's Role: Pharmacist

Allegations:

Dishonest submission of falsified CPPE assessments.
Misleading her employer regarding absence and damaged phones.
Clinical errors, including prescribing contraindicated medications.

Outcome: Removal

GPhC Standards Breached:

Failure to act honestly and with integrity.
Failure to provide adequate patient care.

Case Summary

The GPhC Fitness to Practise Committee considered the case of a pharmacist (the registrant) whose conduct was called into question due to multiple incidents of dishonesty and clinical errors. The allegations highlighted a significant breach of professional standards, undermining public confidence in the pharmacy profession.

Allegations

Falsified CPPE Clinical Assessments:
The registrant submitted falsified declarations and assessments to meet Continuing Professional Development (CPD) requirements. These falsifications included work attributed to individuals who were not authorized assessors.
Dishonest Explanations to Her Employer:
The registrant provided false and misleading explanations when questioned by her employer about incomplete CPPE requirements and missed deadlines. She claimed that her phone, which contained relevant CPPE documents, was damaged and submitted a replacement email to justify her delays. This explanation was proven to be untrue.
Clinical Errors:
The registrant made serious clinical errors, including:
- Prescribing a contraindicated medication that could have resulted in harm.
- Failing to act in accordance with professional and clinical guidelines in her workplace.

Outcome

The Committee concluded that the registrant’s actions demonstrated a lack of honesty, integrity, and clinical competence, which are fundamental to pharmacy practice. Despite the registrant expressing some remorse during the hearing, she failed to provide evidence of meaningful remediation or sustained insight into the seriousness of her misconduct.

Given the severity of the breaches, the Committee determined that removal from the GPhC register was the appropriate outcome to maintain public trust and uphold professional standards.

Key Learning Points for Pharmacists

Integrity Is Non-Negotiable:
Dishonesty, whether related to professional development or workplace interactions, is a severe breach of trust. Pharmacists must always act with honesty and transparency.
CPD Requirements Are Essential:
Falsifying CPD documents not only jeopardizes a pharmacist’s career but also undermines the profession’s commitment to competence and patient safety.
The Importance of Clinical Diligence:
Clinical errors, especially those involving contraindications, emphasize the need for pharmacists to stay vigilant, follow guidelines, and prioritize patient safety.
Remediation and Insight Matter:
In fitness to practise cases, registrants who fail to demonstrate genuine insight into their misconduct and provide evidence of remediation risk severe outcomes, including removal from the register.

Additional Notes

This case reinforces the importance of adhering to GPhC Standards, particularly those requiring pharmacists to act with honesty, maintain competence, and provide safe patient care. Registrants should also ensure they meet CPD requirements honestly and timely, as non-compliance can result in serious professional consequences.

Original Case Document

The full determination transcript is available to logged in users.