Controlled Drug Record-Keeping Failures Lead to 6-Month Suspension for NI Pharmacist

Date of Decision: August 12, 2013

Registrant's Role: Pharmacist

Allegations:

  • The registrant instructed a locum pharmacist to supply a Controlled Drug that had already been assembled and entered into the Controlled Drug Register without a valid prescription being available (Patient A).
  • The registrant instructed a locum pharmacist to dispense Methadone, a Controlled Drug, to a patient who was not accompanied as required by the prescription (Patient B).
  • The registrant failed to properly complete Patient Medication Records (PMR) for a patient receiving Suboxone in that:
  • (a) Records were not always made following the dispensing of a valid prescription.
  • (b) Records did not accurately reflect the dates of supply endorsed on corresponding prescriptions (Patient C).
  • The registrant failed to dispense Diazepam in accordance with the prescribing physician’s instructions (Patient D).
  • The registrant failed to dispense Diazepam on set days when directed to dispense twice weekly, contrary to the prescribing physician’s expectations and best practice (Patient E).
  • The registrant failed to:
  • (a) Maintain an accurate and contemporaneous record in the Controlled Drug Register of the supply of Fentanyl patches (Patient F).
  • (b) Follow dispensing directions as authorised by the prescribing physician (Patient F).

Outcome: Suspension for 6 months, with a review prior to expiry.

GPhC Standards Breached:

  • Standard 1 – Make the safety and wellbeing of patients your first priority
  • Standard 6 – Behave in a professional manner
  • Standard 8 – Speak up when you have concerns or when things go wrong
  • Standard 9 – Demonstrate leadership

Case Summary

Allegations

This case concerned multiple failings in the management and dispensing of Controlled Drugs and other prescription-only medicines over a period of approximately three months. The registrant, a pharmacist, faced allegations relating to Methadone, Suboxone (buprenorphine/naloxone), Diazepam, and Fentanyl patches — all medicines requiring careful clinical oversight and, in several instances, strict compliance with Controlled Drug legislation.

The most serious allegation involved instructing a locum pharmacist to supply a Controlled Drug that had already been assembled and entered into the Controlled Drug Register without a valid prescription being available (Patient A). This conduct raised immediate legal concerns under the Medicines Act 1968 and Controlled Drug regulations.

Continue Reading the Full Case

Create a free account or log in to access the complete case summary.

  • Full allegations considered by the GPhC
  • Panel findings and reasoning
  • Outcome of the investigation
  • Sanctions considered and imposed on the Pharmacist
  • Key professional learning points

Register for Free or Log In

Note: The original PDF document is not available for this case.

Leave a Reply