Controlled Drug Record-Keeping Failures Lead to 6-Month Suspension for NI Pharmacist

Date of Decision: August 12, 2013

Registrant's Role: Pharmacist

Allegations:

  • The registrant instructed a locum pharmacist to supply a Controlled Drug that had already been assembled and entered into the Controlled Drug Register without a valid prescription being available (Patient A).
  • The registrant instructed a locum pharmacist to dispense Methadone, a Controlled Drug, to a patient who was not accompanied as required by the prescription (Patient B).
  • The registrant failed to properly complete Patient Medication Records (PMR) for a patient receiving Suboxone in that:
  • (a) Records were not always made following the dispensing of a valid prescription.
  • (b) Records did not accurately reflect the dates of supply endorsed on corresponding prescriptions (Patient C).
  • The registrant failed to dispense Diazepam in accordance with the prescribing physician’s instructions (Patient D).
  • The registrant failed to dispense Diazepam on set days when directed to dispense twice weekly, contrary to the prescribing physician’s expectations and best practice (Patient E).
  • The registrant failed to:
  • (a) Maintain an accurate and contemporaneous record in the Controlled Drug Register of the supply of Fentanyl patches (Patient F).
  • (b) Follow dispensing directions as authorised by the prescribing physician (Patient F).

Outcome: Suspension for 6 months, with a review prior to expiry.

GPhC Standards Breached:

  • Standard 1 – Make the safety and wellbeing of patients your first priority
  • Standard 6 – Behave in a professional manner
  • Standard 8 – Speak up when you have concerns or when things go wrong
  • Standard 9 – Demonstrate leadership

Case Summary

Allegations

This case concerned multiple failings in the management and dispensing of Controlled Drugs and other prescription-only medicines over a period of approximately three months. The registrant, a pharmacist, faced allegations relating to Methadone, Suboxone (buprenorphine/naloxone), Diazepam, and Fentanyl patches — all medicines requiring careful clinical oversight and, in several instances, strict compliance with Controlled Drug legislation.

The most serious allegation involved instructing a locum pharmacist to supply a Controlled Drug that had already been assembled and entered into the Controlled Drug Register without a valid prescription being available (Patient A). This conduct raised immediate legal concerns under the Medicines Act 1968 and Controlled Drug regulations.

Continue Reading the Full Case

This case was published more than two weeks ago. A premium subscription is required to read the complete case summary.

  • Full allegations considered by the GPhC/PSNI
  • Panel findings and reasoning
  • Outcome of the investigation
  • Sanctions considered and imposed on the Pharmacist
  • Key professional learning points

Become a Premium Subscriber or Log In

Note: The original PDF document is not available for this case.

Leave a Reply