Boots Pharmacist Suspended for Stealing Codeine and Failing to Report Police Caution
Date of Decision: August 1, 2025
Registrant's Role: Pharmacist
Allegations:
- Attended the pharmacy on multiple dates while signed off sick
- Accessed the pharmacy's stock management system ("Columbus") without authorisation
- Entered the dispensary and dispensed medication for personal use
- Ordered large quantities of controlled drugs (codeine and diazepam) without proper justification
- Accepted a police caution for theft of codeine from employer
- Failed to declare the police caution to the GPhC within the required seven-day timeframe
Outcome: Suspension for 8 months with review
GPhC Standards Breached:
- Standard 5 – Pharmacy professionals must use their professional judgement
- Standard 6 – Pharmacy professionals must behave in a professional manner
- Standard 8 – Pharmacy professionals must speak up when they have concerns or when things go wrong
- Standard 9 – Pharmacy professionals must demonstrate leadership
Case Summary
Allegations:
This case involves serious allegations against a pharmacist, who was employed at a Boots Pharmacy branch in Northumberland. The issues arose between April and August 2022 and culminated in a police caution for theft in December 2022. Key allegations included accessing pharmacy systems and the dispensary while signed off sick, manually ordering large quantities of controlled drugs (including 30mg codeine and 2mg diazepam), and self-dispensing medication without authorisation or appropriate clinical oversight.
On 5 August 2022, the registrant entered the dispensary, selected medication for their own prescription, accuracy-checked and clinically checked it themselves, and dispensed it—all while not on duty and signed off sick. CCTV footage and system access logs confirmed these actions. On three dates (5, 13, and 20 August 2022), the registrant stole packs of codeine, leading to a police caution for theft by employee.
Additionally, the registrant failed to notify the GPhC of the caution within seven days, as required by the rules. They eventually self-reported five months later, citing police assurances that the matter would be handled on their behalf.
Continue Reading the Full Case
Create a free account or log in to access the complete case summary.
- Full allegations considered by the GPhC
- Panel findings and reasoning
- Outcome of the investigation
- Sanctions considered and imposed on the Pharmacist
- Key professional learning points
Original Case Document
View the Full Determination Document
The original determination transcript is available to registered users.
- Download the official GPhC determination
- Full hearing transcript
- Detailed findings of fact
- Sanction reasoning
- Details of the pharmacy professionals involved