NI Pharmacist Receives Sanction After Criminal Controlled Drug Handling and Registration Lapse
Date of Decision: December 12, 2025
Registrant's Role: Pharmacist
Allegations:
- Failure to produce controlled drug registers during inspection
- Retrospective entries made to CD registers
- Inadequate private prescription recordkeeping
- Provision of pharmacy services while unregistered
- Unlawful supply of controlled drugs and prescription medications
- Recklessly allowing pharmacy operations without a superintendent
- Acceptance of police caution for nine controlled drug recordkeeping offences
Outcome: 12-month Conditions of Practice Order
GPhC Standards Breached:
- Standard 2.1 β Provide safe, effective and quality care
- Standard 2.1.2 β Effectively control and manage the sale or supply of medicinal and related products paying particular attention to those with a potential for abuse or dependency
- Standard 2.1.4 β Ensure that workload or working conditions do not compromise patient care or public safety
- Standard 2.1.6 β Ensure that you do not, whether by your actions or omissions, create a risk to patient care or public safety
- Standard 2.3 β Record, store and process data clearly and accurately
- Standard 2.3.1 β Complete records promptly or as soon as reasonably practicable after the patient intervention or activity has occurred
- Standard 2.3.3 β Ensure all entries in any record are accurate, clearly and legibly written and attributable
- Standard 3.1.1 β Adhere to accepted and acceptable standards of personal and professional conduct at all times both inside and outside the work environment
Case Summary
Allegations
The case concerned a pharmacist who served as the superintendent of Torrent Pharmacy in Donaghmore, Northern Ireland. Allegations spanned several serious breaches, most significantly relating to the mismanagement of controlled drugs (CDs) and providing pharmaceutical services while not being a registered pharmacist.
The inspection by the Medicines Regulatory Group (MRG) on 1st September 2023 uncovered that the controlled drug registers were not on the premises, but instead at the registrantβs home, in violation of Regulation 20(g) of the Misuse of Drugs Regulations (NI) 2002. Moreover, retrospective entries to these CD registers had been made between 1st and 4th September 2023.
Continue Reading the Full Case
Create a free account or log in to access the complete case summary.
- Full allegations considered by the GPhC
- Panel findings and reasoning
- Outcome of the investigation
- Sanctions considered and imposed on the Pharmacist
- Key professional learning points
Original Case Document
View the Full Determination Document
The original determination transcript is available to registered users.
- Download the official GPhC determination
- Full hearing transcript
- Detailed findings of fact
- Sanction reasoning
- Details of the pharmacy professionals involved
