Fitness to Practise Cases

[ivory-search id="5173" title="FtP cases search form"]

This archive contains General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) Fitness to Practise (FtP) case summaries, detailing regulatory decisions affecting pharmacy professionals in the UK.

Each case provides insight into professional misconduct, errors, and ethical breaches that led to sanctions such as suspension, removal, or warnings. These summaries are valuable for:

  • Pharmacists & Pharmacy Technicians – to understand common regulatory pitfalls.
  • Employers & HR Teams – to learn about professional accountability and compliance.
  • Pharmacy Students – to prepare for real-world ethical challenges in pharmacy practice.

How to use this case summary database:

  • Search for specific cases using the search box above. You can search by keyword (e.g., "controlled drugs," "dishonesty," "suspension"), by sanction type (suspension, removal, warning) or issue type (dishonesty, prescribing errors, controlled drugs, etc.)
  • Alternatively, scroll down to browse the latest FtP case summaries.

Why it matters:

The decisions in these cases shape the legal and ethical landscape of pharmacy practice. Staying informed can help pharmacy professionals avoid similar mistakes and maintain high professional standards.

Latest FtP case summaries:

Pharmacist Suspended for Attempting to Extract Patient Data

Date of Decision: October 11, 2023

Allegations: On 13 June 2021, while working as a Locum Pharmacist at Tesco Pharmacy Lincoln Extra, attempted to extract and transfer personal sensitive patient data, including patient names, NHS numbers, medication history and GP details from the pharmacy computer onto an external USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 device. Actions were dishonest as the registrant knew they did not have authority or permission to transfer such data and there was no clinical justification to transfer such data.

Outcome: Suspension for 8 months with review

Read more »

Pharmacist’s Suspension Reviewed: Insight and Remediation Lead to No Further Action

Date of Decision: January 4, 2024

Allegations: Worked as an Independent Prescriber Pharmacist at Instant E-Care Limited between 5 September and 18 October 2019. The pharmacy's process did not safeguard vulnerable patients, lacking governance for medicines liable to abuse or misuse. Patients could choose medicines before consultation; insufficient information was gathered to ensure clinically appropriate prescribing. Prescriptions were issued without verifying patients' diagnoses with their GPs. Registrant was unable to demonstrate competency in prescribing many available medicines. Prescribing process lacked peer review, affecting safety and effectiveness of care. Serious risk of harm due to lack of competency in managing high-risk medications.

Outcome: Not impaired, suspension to expire at the end of 13 January 2024

Read more »

Pharmacist’s Suspension Extended Due to Continued Impairment in Controlled Drugs Dispensing Case

Date of Decision: February 5, 2024

Allegations: Dispensing controlled drugs without a prescription. Failure to ensure the safe dispensing of controlled drugs. Dispensing and self-checking controlled drugs. Allowing dispensers to give controlled drugs without supervision. Failure to report incidents on the company reporting system (DATIX) in a timely manner.

Outcome: Suspension extended for 6 months, with further review

Read more »

Pharmacist’s Fitness to Practise Review: Insight and Remediation Lead to Lapse of Suspension

Date of Decision: February 15, 2024

Allegations: Ordered medication using the Pharmacy’s PMR system without adequate audit trail. Took stock from the Pharmacy without payment. Provided private prescriptions without permission or indemnity insurance. Charged patients a fee for private prescriptions without permission. Dishonestly charged for private prescriptions to make personal financial gain.

Outcome: Current order to lapse upon expiry (6 March 2024)

Read more »