Fitness to Practise Cases

[ivory-search id="5173" title="FtP cases search form"]

This archive contains General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) Fitness to Practise (FtP) case summaries, detailing regulatory decisions affecting pharmacy professionals in the UK.

Each case provides insight into professional misconduct, errors, and ethical breaches that led to sanctions such as suspension, removal, or warnings. These summaries are valuable for:

  • Pharmacists & Pharmacy Technicians – to understand common regulatory pitfalls.
  • Employers & HR Teams – to learn about professional accountability and compliance.
  • Pharmacy Students – to prepare for real-world ethical challenges in pharmacy practice.

How to use this case summary database:

  • Search for specific cases using the search box above. You can search by keyword (e.g., "controlled drugs," "dishonesty," "suspension"), by sanction type (suspension, removal, warning) or issue type (dishonesty, prescribing errors, controlled drugs, etc.)
  • Alternatively, scroll down to browse the latest FtP case summaries.

Why it matters:

The decisions in these cases shape the legal and ethical landscape of pharmacy practice. Staying informed can help pharmacy professionals avoid similar mistakes and maintain high professional standards.

Latest FtP case summaries:

Pharmacist Receives GPhC Warning Following Police Caution for Domestic Incident

Date of Decision: March 9, 2015

Allegations: Received a police caution for assault by beating following a domestic incident involving his spouse. The GPhC Fitness to Practise Committee assessed whether this caution impaired the pharmacist’s fitness to practise. Concerns were raised about the registrant’s lack of initial insight in his early communications with the Council. The GPhC argued that a finding of impairment was necessary to maintain public confidence in the profession.

Outcome: Warning, which would remain on the public register for two years

Read more »

Pharmacist’s Fitness to Practise Restored After Controlled Drugs Documentation Failure and Police Caution

Date of Decision: March 2, 2015

Allegations: Failure to properly process and endorse prescriptions for controlled drugs (methadone), leading to financial loss for the employer. Failure to comply with Regulation 16(2) of the Misuse of Drugs Regulations 2001. Attempting to avoid contact with both the police and the General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) inspectors. Failing to notify the GPhC of a change in address, breaching registration requirements. Accepting a police caution for failure to comply with controlled drug regulations.

Outcome: Registrant's fitness to practise was no longer impaired

Read more »

Restoration of Pharmacist’s Registration After 13 Years

Date of Decision: December 14, 2021

Allegations: Removed a Pharmacy’s controlled drugs register for methadone and took it home. Entrusted the controlled drugs register to a non-pharmacist third party. Supplied Flucloxacillin to himself without a prescription. Supplied Venlafaxine to himself without a prescription. Left boxes of Ritalin outside the controlled drugs cabinet. Stored patient-returned controlled drugs in a locker for two weeks. Removed date-expired and/or patient-returned Nicorette products for personal use. Removed date-expired Nicorette and vitamin products from a second pharmacy for personal use. Engaged an unqualified person to assist in a pharmacy.

Outcome: Application granted

Read more »

Pharmacist Suspended for Dispensing Controlled Drugs Without Prescription

Date of Decision: August 2, 2023

Allegations: Dispensed controlled drugs to patients without a prescription. Failed to ensure the safe dispensing of controlled drugs by self-checking. Instructed dispensers to give controlled drugs without supervision. Failed to report incidents on the company reporting system in a timely manner.

Outcome: Suspension for 6 months

Read more »

Pharmacist Suspended for Failing to Maintain Indemnity Insurance and Dishonesty

Date of Decision: October 18, 2023

Allegations: Failed to ensure appropriate indemnity insurance for the pharmacy between 6 April 2010 and 29 November 2020. Dishonestly declared having professional indemnity insurance during GPhC registration renewals from 2009 to 2020. Misled a GPhC inspector about the lapse of indemnity insurance. Dishonestly concealed the full duration of operating without indemnity insurance.

Outcome: Suspension of three months, no review

Read more »