Pharmacist Cleared to Return to Practice After Public Indecency Caution and Regulatory Breach

Date of Decision: May 31, 2019

Registrant's Role: Pharmacist

Allegations:

  • Accepted a conditional police caution for an act of public indecency.
  • Failed to notify the GPhC of the police caution within the required 7-day period.
  • Provided false declarations during the annual registration renewal by denying any cautions or convictions.

Outcome: Fitness to practise no longer impaired; suspension order to lapse

GPhC Standards Breached:

  • Standard 2 โ€“ Work in partnership with others
  • Standard 5 โ€“ Use professional judgement
  • Standard 6 โ€“ Behave professionally

Case Summary

Allegations

The pharmacist in this case was the subject of a Fitness to Practise investigation after accepting a conditional police caution for a serious act of public indecency. The caution arose from an incident in which the registrant was observed by a member of the public, Witness A, in a supermarket car park, with his penis exposed, allegedly stroking it while deliberately turning toward the witness. Witness A testified that the behaviour lasted several minutes, during which she felt shocked and violated.

Following the incident, the registrant admitted to police that his penis was exposed but claimed it was due to irritation, and that he was applying cream for a skin condition. He accepted the caution and wrote letters of apology to both Witness A and a supermarket employee who also witnessed the event.

Continue Reading the Full Case

Create a free account or log in to access the complete case summary.

  • Full allegations considered by the GPhC
  • Panel findings and reasoning
  • Outcome of the investigation
  • Sanctions considered and imposed on the Pharmacist
  • Key professional learning points

Register for Free or Log In

Original Case Document

View the Full Determination Document

The original determination transcript is available to registered users.

  • Download the official GPhC determination
  • Full hearing transcript
  • Detailed findings of fact
  • Sanction reasoning
  • Details of the pharmacy professionals involved

Register for Free or Log In

Leave a Reply