Pharmacist Issued a Formal Warning for Inappropriate Workplace Conduct

Date of Decision: November 9, 2023

Registrant's Role: Pharmacist

Allegations:

  • While working as a locum pharmacist at Asda Pharmacy, Morley, Leeds, the pharmacist:
  • Made inappropriate comments to a female colleague (Witness A) on 20 May 2020, including asking whether she had intimate piercings and about the location of her tattoos.
  • Touched her arm while saying, “Feel the relaxation running through your body” or words to that effect.
  • Engaged in inappropriate behaviour towards Witness A between 20 May 2020 and 1 June 2020 by:
  • Standing too close to her.
  • Physically touching her.
  • Allegedly blocked Witness A’s movement and refused to move out of her way.
  • The GPhC considered whether the pharmacist’s conduct was sexually motivated but did not find sufficient evidence to prove this claim.

Outcome: Formal warning

GPhC Standards Breached:

  • Standard 6 - Behave in a professional manner
  • Standard 9 - Demonstrate leadership

Case Summary

The General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) Fitness to Practise Committee investigated a pharmacist after a female colleague, Witness A, made a complaint about inappropriate comments and behaviour while working at Asda Pharmacy, Morley, Leeds.

Between 20 May 2020 and 1 June 2020, the pharmacist allegedly:

Continue Reading the Full Case

Create a free account or log in to access the complete case summary.

  • Full allegations considered by the GPhC
  • Panel findings and reasoning
  • Outcome of the investigation
  • Sanctions considered and imposed on the Pharmacist
  • Key professional learning points

Register for Free or Log In

Original Case Document

View the Full Determination Document

The original determination transcript is available to registered users.

  • Download the official GPhC determination
  • Full hearing transcript
  • Detailed findings of fact
  • Sanction reasoning
  • Details of the pharmacy professionals involved

Register for Free or Log In

Leave a Reply