Pharmacist Removed from Register Following Conviction for Fraud and Drug Supply

Date of Decision: April 14, 2023

Registrant's Role: Pharmacist

Allegations:

  • Conviction for fraud by abuse of position.
  • Being concerned in supplying a controlled drug (Class B).

Outcome: Removed

GPhC Standards Breached:

  • Standard 2: Pharmacy professionals must work in partnership with others.
  • Standard 8: Pharmacy professionals must speak up when they have concerns or when things go wrong.
  • Standard 9: Pharmacy professionals must demonstrate leadership.

Case Summary

In a recent determination by the General Pharmaceutical Council’s Fitness to Practise Committee, a pharmacist was removed from the register following a conviction for fraud by abuse of position and being concerned in supplying a controlled drug. The hearing, held remotely on April 13-14, 2023, found the pharmacist’s fitness to practise impaired due to these convictions.

Allegations
The pharmacist faced allegations of fraud by abuse of position and involvement in the supply of a controlled drug, following a guilty plea. These actions were contrary to sections of the Fraud Act 2006 and the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971.

Findings
The Committee found that the pharmacist had been coerced into supplying over 2000 bottles of codeine linctus and Phenergan to unknown individuals, who threatened his family. Despite the coercion, the pharmacist continued these activities over a significant period without reporting the threats to his employer or the police until confronted.

GPhC Determination on Impairment
The Committee determined that the pharmacist’s conduct presented a risk to the public and brought the profession into disrepute. The pharmacist breached several GPhC standards, including failing to work in partnership with others, not speaking up when things went wrong, and not demonstrating leadership.

Sanction
Considering the seriousness of the convictions, the Committee concluded that removal from the register was the only appropriate sanction. This decision was made to protect the public, maintain confidence in the profession, and uphold professional standards.

Learning Points for Pharmacy Professionals

Continue Reading the Full Case

Create a free account or log in to access the complete case summary.

  • Full allegations considered by the GPhC
  • Panel findings and reasoning
  • Outcome of the investigation
  • Sanctions considered and imposed on the Pharmacist
  • Key professional learning points

Register for Free or Log In

Original Case Document

View the Full Determination Document

The original determination transcript is available to registered users.

  • Download the official GPhC determination
  • Full hearing transcript
  • Detailed findings of fact
  • Sanction reasoning
  • Details of the pharmacy professionals involved

Register for Free or Log In

Leave a Reply