Pharmacist Removed from Register for Supplying Codeine Linctus and Phenergan Without Clinical Justification

Date of Decision: May 24, 2024

Registrant's Role: Pharmacist

Allegations:

  • Engaged in text conversations about supplying Codeine Linctus and Phenergan.
  • Supplied or offered to supply these medicines without clinical need.
  • Knew or believed they would be misused.

Outcome: Removal from the Register with interim suspension imposed

GPhC Standards Breached:

  • Standard 5 โ€“ Using professional judgment
  • Standard 6 โ€“ Behaving in a professional manner
  • Standard 9 โ€“ Demonstrating leadership

Case Summary

The registrant, a pharmacist first registered in 2015, was employed at a London pharmacy. Concerns arose when another pharmacist (“Pharmacist 1”) was suspected of diverting medicines for misuse. Investigators discovered text message exchanges between Pharmacist 1 and the registrant, discussing the supply of Codeine Linctus and Phenergan.

These medicines, when combined, form a substance known as “Lean” or “Purple Drank,” which is abused recreationally. Given the known potential for misuse of these drugs, many pharmacies refuse to stock them. The registrant, however, repeatedly supplied these medicines upon request.

Investigation and Evidence

Continue Reading the Full Case

Create a free account or log in to access the complete case summary.

  • Full allegations considered by the GPhC
  • Panel findings and reasoning
  • Outcome of the investigation
  • Sanctions considered and imposed on the Pharmacist
  • Key professional learning points

Register for Free or Log In

Original Case Document

View the Full Determination Document

The original determination transcript is available to registered users.

  • Download the official GPhC determination
  • Full hearing transcript
  • Detailed findings of fact
  • Sanction reasoning
  • Details of the pharmacy professionals involved

Register for Free or Log In

Leave a Reply