Pharmacist Suspended for Assisting Suicide Using Stolen Medicines
Date of Decision: December 4, 2018
Registrant's Role: Pharmacist
Allegations:
- Conviction for criminal offences involving theft of prescription medicines.
- Assisting in the suicide of a vulnerable individual using stolen controlled drugs.
- Breach of legal and professional obligations relating to the handling and use of controlled substances.
Outcome: Suspension from the register for 12 months
GPhC Standards Breached:
- Standard 1.2 – Take action to protect the well-being of patients and the public.
- Standard 1.3 – Promote the health of patients and the public.
- Standard 2.2 – Make sure that your professional judgment is not affected by personal or organisational interests.
- Standard 3.9 – Maintain proper professional boundaries in relationships with patients and others.
- Standard 6.1 – Act with honesty and integrity to maintain public trust and confidence in your profession.
- Standard 6.3 – Avoid conflicts of interest and declare any personal or professional interests.
- Standard 6.5 – Meet acceptable standards of personal and professional conduct.
- Standard 6.6 – Comply with legal and professional requirements and accepted guidance on professional practice.
Case Summary
This case involved a pharmacist who assisted the suicide of Mr A, a vulnerable individual experiencing profound loneliness and emotional distress. The registrant stole Oramorph (a Schedule 2 controlled drug) and insulin from the pharmacy, failing to record their removal, and administered them to Mr A in a premeditated act to help him end his life. After initially attempting to conceal the cause of death, the registrant later confessed to the police and was convicted of criminal offences, including assisting suicide and theft of prescription-only medicines.
Findings:
The Fitness to Practise Committee concluded that the registrant’s conduct amounted to serious professional misconduct. He breached fundamental standards by misusing his position to access and unlawfully supply controlled drugs, failing to maintain proper boundaries, and acting contrary to the ethical duties of a pharmacist. Despite a previously exemplary 35-year career, the Committee found that the gravity of the conduct warranted regulatory action. As the Committee stated:
Continue Reading the Full Case
Create a free account or log in to access the complete case summary.
- Full allegations considered by the GPhC
- Panel findings and reasoning
- Outcome of the investigation
- Sanctions considered and imposed on the Pharmacist
- Key professional learning points
Original Case Document
View the Full Determination Document
The original determination transcript is available to registered users.
- Download the official GPhC determination
- Full hearing transcript
- Detailed findings of fact
- Sanction reasoning
- Details of the pharmacy professionals involved