Pharmacist Suspended for Controlled Drug Governance Failures and Inadequate Oversight as Superintendent
Date of Decision: February 24, 2026
Registrant's Role: Pharmacist
Allegations:
- Failed to put measures in place to maintain the supervision and safe running of the pharmacy whilst off sick from 31 May 2022 until a date unknown in July 2022.
- Failed to ensure the Responsible Pharmacist (RP) log was adequately maintained: The RP log showed the registrant signed in as RP between 1 June 2022 and 20 July 2022 whilst off sick; The RP log did not show the correct RP on duty during that period.
- Failed to put in place sufficient pharmacy records in line with guidance: No near miss log; No Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) registration until 21 July 2022.
- Failed to comply with safe custody requirements for Controlled Drugs (CDs) by storing the following in a drawer in August 2022: Three ampoules of morphine sulphate; Five Butec patches; Approximately 29 boxes of buprenorphine tablets.
- Failed to store CDs in a locked cabinet by leaving: A glass measure containing Physeptone solution; A 500ml bottle of Physeptone solution on a bench.
- Failed to keep accurate balance checks of Physeptone SF solution.
- Failed to keep CD register entries accurate and up to date, including discrepancies involving morphine sulphate and Zomorph.
- Failed to ensure sufficient procedures or controls to account for large quantities of codeine linctus (Galenphol and Galcodine) purchased and supplied.
- Between 8 August 2022 and 31 August 2023: Failed to ensure CD registers were accurate and up to date (Zomorph and Oxycodone proved; Physeptone not proved); Failed to ensure patient-returned CDs were accurately recorded and disposed of.
Outcome: Suspension for 3 months with review (interim suspension imposed).
GPhC Standards Breached:
- Standard 6 – Pharmacy professionals must behave in a professional manner.
- Standard 8 – Pharmacy professionals must speak up when they have concerns or when things go wrong.
- Standard 9 – Pharmacy professionals must demonstrate leadership.
Case Summary
Allegations
This case concerned a pharmacist who was the Superintendent Pharmacist (SI), owner, and regular Responsible Pharmacist (RP) of a community pharmacy. The concerns arose following an NHS England inspection in July 2022 and subsequent GPhC inspections.
At the time of the first inspection, the registrant was off sick following a heart attack. However, inspectors identified significant governance failings. The RP log incorrectly showed the registrant signed in daily during a period when he was absent. There was no accessible locum pack, no near miss log, and no ICO registration in place.
Continue Reading the Full Case
Create a free account or log in to access the complete case summary.
- Full allegations considered by the GPhC
- Panel findings and reasoning
- Outcome of the investigation
- Sanctions considered and imposed on the Pharmacist
- Key professional learning points
Original Case Document
View the Full Determination Document
The original determination transcript is available to registered users.
- Download the official GPhC determination
- Full hearing transcript
- Detailed findings of fact
- Sanction reasoning
- Details of the pharmacy professionals involved
