Pharmacy Technician Removed from GPhC Register for Dishonesty in Job Applications and Regulatory Hearings
Date of Decision: July 5, 2022
Registrant's Role: Pharmacy technician
Allegations:
- The pharmacy technician was subject to a Conditions of Practice Order from July 2019, following a Principal Hearing in 2018 where her fitness to practise was found to be impaired due to misconduct and deficient professional performance.
- In June or July 2020, she applied for a job at Bromley GP Alliance and:
- Failed to disclose her ongoing fitness to practise proceedings.
- Misrepresented the extent of restrictions on her practice, only stating that she could not work as a locum or relief technician.
- In October 2020, she submitted a DBS self-declaration form where she:
- Answered "no" when asked if she was subject to fitness to practise restrictions, despite being under a Conditions of Practice Order.
- Failed to answer a question about past investigations, and later falsely claimed the answer was โnoโ when prompted.
- During a GPhC Review Hearing on 14 December 2020, she:
- Falsely stated that her employer knew about her conditions of practice, when in reality, she had not informed them.
- Misrepresented her role at Bromley, stating that she did not take medication histories, when her job description included this responsibility.
- In February 2021, her employer discovered the dishonesty, and she was dismissed following an internal disciplinary hearing.
Outcome: Removal from the GPhC register.
GPhC Standards Breached:
- Standard 2 โ Work in Partnership with Others
- Standard 6 โ Behave in a Professional Manner
- Standard 7 โ Respect and Maintain Confidentiality
- Standard 8 โ Speak Up When Things Go Wrong
- Standard 9 โ Demonstrate Leadership
Case Summary
The General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC) Fitness to Practise Committee investigated a pharmacy technician after dishonestly misrepresenting her fitness to practise status and failing to disclose conditions placed on her registration.
Following a 2018 Principal Hearing, she was found impaired due to misconduct and deficient professional performance, which led to a Conditions of Practice Order in July 2019. The order required her to:
Continue Reading the Full Case
Create a free account or log in to access the complete case summary.
- Full allegations considered by the GPhC
- Panel findings and reasoning
- Outcome of the investigation
- Sanctions considered and imposed on the Pharmacy technician
- Key professional learning points
Original Case Document
View the Full Determination Document
The original determination transcript is available to registered users.
- Download the official GPhC determination
- Full hearing transcript
- Detailed findings of fact
- Sanction reasoning
- Details of the pharmacy professionals involved
